The hottest Intel chose to fight the WAPI event in

  • Detail

Intel chose to fight the WAPI incident in the eyes of the public on March 9, an Intel spokesman said that it could not support the WAPI security standard for wireless local area devices that China would enforce on June 1. In other words, Intel would rather abandon the Chinese market than transform the chip according to WAPI China national standard. This is another international giant who has come out to resist Chinese national standards after the Wi-Fi alliance and Broadcom. Not long ago, an Intel spokesman also said that in the long run, it is indeed necessary for the company to study the requirements and technical characteristics of the new standard, and the company's senior management is also cooperating with relevant Chinese government departments to better understand the new standard. Intel's new statement shows that in the negotiations with the Chinese government, Intel did not get the expected immunity and had to show its killer mace. As the world's number one chipmaker for more than a decade in a row, it understands the impact of out of stock on the Chinese market, where "core diseases are difficult to cure"

what will the Chinese government do, confrontation or compromise? Does WAPI have the strength to replace the current standards of Wi-Fi alliance? Will the implementation of WAPI standards harm the interests of consumers, as stated by foreign media

let's listen to the voices of the people. These voices may be one-sided or even extreme, but due to the inherent truth and magnanimity of the network, it is possible for us to have a deeper understanding of this event from our friends' different interpretations of WAPI

I support, I oppose


for the sake of national security, I think it's better to have our own standards, especially in the wireless industrial age. If all the electromagnetic signals flowing in our air are encrypted from abroad, imagine what else can be hidden in our country

IP:61.183.70.* :

standards are the rules of the game. We must have our own standards and our own international standards. Only in this way can we have the opportunity to develop to the world's advanced level, otherwise we can only pick up the leftovers of others behind others' hips

intel's strong opposition is only that it will undoubtedly increase its production costs and weaken its market competitiveness. At present, we should vigorously welcome AMD. No enterprise is willing to compete with a country, especially a country with huge market potential like China. What we need to do is to support the government, WAPI and our own international standards

lost little bookboy:

support national standards! Although there will be losses in the short term, what we get is a bright "money" path


some obvious problems have created the confidence of Intel's ambition, but it can't be said that there is no way. You know, now the standard of a China is the standard of the world, and our mastery of the market has become our only advantage. We can choose confrontation rather than compromise


support, as long as there is money in the current market, we can always find alternatives


Intel competes with China, and China can just give amd a chance. If we delay for three or five years, we may have our own processor. The government is determined to fight to the end with those who "get stuck in China's neck"


invert black and white. Patriotism doesn't necessarily depend on full nonsense. Who said "embargo" first??? Who wants to close the Chinese market? Is it Wi Fi? Or ourselves

this kind of regional protection is not good for our consumers, nor for our enterprises. What our enterprises lack is the early-stage investment in technology. The more it is protected, the less promising it will be


basically smoothcactus said what I wanted to say. The formulation of this policy is no different from the previous government rent-seeking

as a party participating in the game, the Chinese government must consider the interests of the other party. The purpose of international trade is not to win alone, but to win more; If you want to win all the cards in others' hands, others will definitely not play with you anymore. This WLAN policy is no different from unilaterally raising tariffs, which can be said to exceed the bottom line of Wi Fi/Intel

to participate in international standard games, we must first recognize the existing rules of the game. Reality shows that if the government wants to forcibly promote a commercial enterprise, the past is contrary to its wishes


anything that wants to restrict the free market through government policies is like shutting down the country; Anyone who wants to use the so-called nationalism to oppose foreign technology (and the benefits it brings) is equal to the government monopoly, which will sooner or later be despised by others, and can only hinder economic development; Breaking market rules

IP:207.46.71.* :

supporting Intel is protecting the interests of domestic consumers

IP:221.12.85.* :

support Intel, let the market have the final say


I think the core of this problem is whether China's WAPI can enter the IEEE 802.11 standard. If WAPI cannot enter the IEEE 802.11 protocol family, no matter whether other manufacturers will provide China with standard Wi Fi chips, it must be a double lose result

in reporting this event, the media used words such as "embargo". I think it is deliberate hype by the media, and it does not rule out that groups with relevant interests deliberately confuse the public and manipulate the media to achieve their own goals and strive to promote the development of new materials

hidden worries under WAPI


in order to achieve China's real development and prosperity, and in order to appear the technical standards that truly belong to Chinese enterprises in 10 years, we must now open up, and let enterprises compete and survive in a free market environment. Government intervention and so-called efforts are futile, and we should be careful of the hidden personal conspiracy behind this, It is even more destructive to the development of the country and the economy. Graphene biological devices are deeper: because graphene has the characteristics of modifiable chemical function, large contact area, atomic size and thickness, molecular gate structure and so on


if you want to really revitalize China's IT industry, you can develop your own industry instead of relying solely on your own country to formulate your own standards and restrict the entry of other people's products Don't forget that only competition can make development possible. Only by not being eliminated by competition can such products revitalize China's IT industry. Just think, if the products developed by yourself are only 80% of others

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI